New ladder: changes are afoot
What's this: Cashtro in second place following 2 wins and 2 seconds - what a hero! And Damo winning one, what the hell?
Some of us are also of the opinion that heads up for first and second is absolutely random - almost always a 50/50 proposition, witnessed by the fact that both I, and James, have come back from about a 13:1 down chip ratio to win, by going all in without looking at the cards. Hmmm, makes you wonder. What would the ladder look like if first and second, seeing as they are random, accrued the same number of points, say 1? Let's see:
Hmmm... Food for though. Does this make me the best player? I don't see why not.
| Player | Points | Wins | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
| James | 150 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Cashtro | 140 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Chris | 120 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Damian | 80 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Louis | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Some of us are also of the opinion that heads up for first and second is absolutely random - almost always a 50/50 proposition, witnessed by the fact that both I, and James, have come back from about a 13:1 down chip ratio to win, by going all in without looking at the cards. Hmmm, makes you wonder. What would the ladder look like if first and second, seeing as they are random, accrued the same number of points, say 1? Let's see:
| Player | Points | Wins | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
| Cashtro | 14 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Chris | 12 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| James | 12 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Damian | 10 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Louis | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Hmmm... Food for though. Does this make me the best player? I don't see why not.
posted by Andrew C @ 5:47 PM
1 comments
